![]() ![]() When disputes involving genetic theft from public figures inevitably reach the courtroom, judges will need to confront fundamental questions about how genetics relates to personhood and identity, property, health and disease, intellectual property and reproductive rights. Despite this, there are few laws protecting the interests of individuals regarding their genetic material and information. Ultimately, taking an individual’s genetic material and information without their consent is an intrusion into a legal domain that is still considered deeply personal. In vitro gametogenesis (IVG), while still in development, could allow prospective parents to create egg or sperm from other parts of the body, like skin. But as more advanced, faster and cheaper genetic technologies have reached the consumer realm, these concerns seem not only reasonable, but justified. She has hired cleaning crews to sterilize her dressing rooms after concerts and requires her own new toilet seats at each stop of her tours.Īt first, Madonna was ridiculed for having DNA paranoia. While these concerns may seem relatively new, pop star celebrity Madonna has been raising alarm bells about the potential for nonconsensual, surreptitious collection and testing of DNA for over a decade. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz similarly refused to take a Russian PCR COVID-19 test. ![]() Many speculated that Macron refused due to security concerns that the Russians would take and use his DNA for nefarious purposes. So it was with a picture of French President Emmanuel Macron and Russian President Vladimir Putin sitting at opposite ends of a very long table after Macron declined to take a Russian PCR COVID-19 test in 2022. Every so often stories of genetic theft, or extreme precautions taken to avoid it, make headline news. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |